Product Design Defect

A product imperfection occurring when the seller or distributor could have reduced or avoided a foreseeable risk of harm by adopting a reasonable alternative design, and when, as a result of not using the alternative, the product is not reasonably safe.

Design Defects

(a) In a products liability action in which a claimant alleges a design defect, the burden is on the claimant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that:

(1) there was a safer alternative design; and

(2) the defect was a producing cause of the personal injury, property damage, or death for which the claimant seeks recovery.

(b) In this section, "safer alternative design" means a product design other than the one actually used that in reasonable probability:

(1) would have prevented or significantly reduced the risk of the claimant's personal injury, property damage, or death without substantially impairing the product's utility; and

(2) was economically and technologically feasible at the time the product left the control of the manufacturer or seller by the application of existing or reasonably achievable scientific knowledge.

(c) This section does not supersede or modify any statute, regulation, or other law of this state or of the United States that relates to liability for, or to relief in the form of, abatement of nuisance, civil penalties, cleanup costs, cost recovery, an injunction, or restitution that arises from contamination or pollution of the environment.

(d) This section does not apply to:

(1) a cause of action based on a toxic or environmental tort as defined by Sections 33.013(c)(2) and (3); or

(2) a drug or device, as those terms are defined in the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. Section 321).

(e) This section is not declarative, by implication or otherwise, of the common law with respect to any product and shall not be construed to restrict the courts of this state in developing the common law with respect to any product which is not subject to this section.

Above text from US Government Texas law statutes

To read in full or read more on topic http://www.capitol.state.tx.us

Content Related to Topic

• Hexcel Corp. Pays for Sale of Defective Zylon Bullet Proof Vests
  Hexcel Corporation has agreed to pay the United States fifteen million to resolve allegations it violated the False Claims Act.



• Nintendo Wii Component Recall
  An estimated 500,000 Wiis have been sold since the launch date



• Target Recalls Various Toys Due To Lead And Laceration Hazards
  Target has received four reports of toys breaking apart, exposing sharp points



• Espresso Maker Liability For Burn And Impact Injury Hazards
  Heating element can forcefully separate from its base during the brewing cycle, this poses burn and impact injury hazards to nearby consumers



• Wal Mart Recalls Home Trends Footstools, Liability For Collapse Hazard
  Due to improper construction, the stool can break and collapse, posing a fall hazard to consumers



• United States Marshals Seize Defective Infusion Pumps
  The seized infusion pumps have a design defect called 'key bounce' that may cause potential over-infusion of medications



• Baxter Healthcare Corp. Agrees To Correct Manufacturing Deficiencies
  Baxter and two of its top corporate executives have signed a consent decree of condemnation and permanent injunction for certain infusion pumps made by the firm



• Ford To Fix Fire-Prone Trucks One Of Industry's Largest
  Ford Recalls, 3.8 Million Trucks, Comes As Ailing Automaker Faces Mounting Lawsuits



• Studies By Forrester Research Estimate Several Costs Of Bad Design Product
  Studies By Forrester Research Estimate Several Costs Of Bad Design Product The Two Most Striking Are

Find a Lawyer